Peer review
Contents
Peer review¶
We are discussing peer review in this module because it is an important part of the research endeavor and scientific discourse. What’s surprising, however, is that while we are taught how to do science and how to write up our own work, we’re never really taught how to write about others’ work, whether it’s a summary, critique, constructive criticism, or something else. Maybe this is why so many scientists have to face the diatribe of Reviewer #2 [1]. Since giving feedback and receiving feedback is valuable to everyone, we will practice it here, in the context of our final presentations.
Discussion¶
References¶
- 1
Steve Cranford. I don't know it for a fact... but they're definitely reviewer #2. Matter, 3(5):1377–1379, 2020. doi:10.1016/j.matt.2020.09.028.